 |
Evaluations
It was good to work as a team,
focus on a particular aspect and then have time to consider
and implement.”
An interim evaluation was completed
after Session 3. School teams’ ratings of several
statements on a five point scale (where 1 = strongly disagree
and 5 = strongly agree) were:
| The WW program, with its school
teams approach and four half-day sessions spread over
time, is a good model for professional learning. |
22 of 22 teams rated 4 or
5 |
| On balance the four WW sessions
have been productive, interesting and engaging. |
19 of 22 teams rated 4 or
5 |
| The program has developed
my understanding and capacity in terms of improving
educational outcomes for Koorie students. |
15 of 22 teams rated 4 or
5 |
After Session 4, a similar evaluation was conducted, this
time asking for the responses of individuals:
| The WW program, with its school
teams approach and four half-day sessions spread over
time, is a good model for professional learning. |
55 of 56 participants rated
4 or 5 |
| On balance the four WW sessions
have been productive, interesting and engaging. |
41 of 56 participants rated
4 or 5 |
| The program has developed
my understanding and capacity in terms of improving
educational outcomes for Koorie students. |
46 of 56 participants rated
4 or 5 |
|
